Friday, December 13, 2013

Ear Cropping - The Good And The Bad

By Jeannie Chapman


There has been much debate around the process of ear cropping with more animal laws coming up against the practice and more pet owners finding it difficult to find veterinarians to implement such modifications. The procedure is largely dependent on owner preference for the appearance of canines, but the unfortunate side is a failure to consider what would be in the best interests of the animal. It is important to consider the features that are associated with such intervention before moving forward with such changes.

Most of the purebred breeds including pits and dobermans will have the ears cropped as it contributes to more of an aesthetic appeal and makes the animal appear more impressive. The method is considered invasive and is only advised for animals that are younger than 12 weeks. Although it is a relatively common process, it does not offer any benefits in terms of medical or environmental needs, serving only to alter the appeal of dogs.

Reliable breeders will seek to have the ears of young pups cropped before it leaves for its new home, but if you are faced with the decision, it is necessary to consider the measures that have been associated with such practice. The crop is a surgery that involves the removal of the top of the ears and may involve the insertion of supports in order to maintain an erect appearance. Upright ears requires constant taping that will need to take place for a few weeks to achieve the desired result.

Through the ages many breeds have been associated with the cropped look said to provide the animal with a more distinct and intimidating appearance. Tail docking and cropped ears are merely aesthetic and unless medical reasons are presented, there is no need to have such procedures performed. The recovery for animals is long and requires ongoing taping and care to prevent infection from developing down the line.

The practice is considered unnecessary and in most cases cruel because it causes distress for canines. Many organizations have fought for animal rights and believe that the surgery only serves to appease owners, but does not offer any form of benefits for the animals. More people are attempting to crop without vet support resulting in severely disfigured animals.

Among the benefits of cropped ears is said to be a decrease in infections of the inner canal. Veterinarians disagree and state that all dogs with different ear shapes sustain bacteria and dirt that has been argued by many pet owners as the canal is provided greater levels of circulation and moisture is prevented. If you are going to proceed with such methods it should only be applied by licensed persons.

Many styles can be applied for the cropped ears involving a shorter or a longer trim. Animal doctors possessing the necessary levels of skill and experience should be consulted to implement such methods. If it is not applied by a qualified person, it can result in poor results and increased stress placed on animals.

The process of ear cropping is regarded a common trend that has focused on much debate. Veterinarians will not apply the physical changes because it does not offer benefits for the animal. Changes that are made to the puppy should only be performed in consultation with an experienced and qualified vet.




About the Author:



No comments: